Dear House Finance Subcommittee on Health and Human
Services,
Sisters |
I am providing you with written testimony today strongly
opposing Governor Kasich’s Budget Proposal for 2016-2017 to phase out Ohio’s
certified Medicaid Independent Providers for several reasons. I would like to
explain to you how this proposal to phase out Ohio’s Certified Medicaid
Independent Providers will negatively impact myself, my family, our livelihood,
our future, my developmentally disabled sister, her rights, her freedoms, her
protections, her life, her future, and most importantly her health, her safety,
and her happiness!
My sister is 45 years old and is developmentally disabled,
she has been a recipient of the IO Waiver for 20+ years. She has had to endure
a lot of pain, abuse, neglect, and inappropriate care throughout her years of
being involved in Ohio’s Developmental Disabilities (DD) system, mostly at the
hands of Agency Providers. We have spent those same 20+ years constantly
fighting for my sister, her rights, her freedoms, her protections, her health
and safety, her happiness, her future, and many times her life!
Aside from fighting a broken DD system, we have had to fight
to make sure my sister received the proper medical care she deserved and
required in order to stay alive. We have been by my sister’s side every single
step of the way fighting for and caring for her like nobody else would ever
consider doing!!!
- When
my sister had life-saving brain surgery not a single employee, house manager,
or administrative staff of the agency provider came to visit my sister during
her 2 month recovery process! We were there every single day, sometimes 2-3
times per day!!!
My sister has resided in and received care from many
different Agency Providers/ Group Homes all of which have failed to care for
her properly! There have been too many times and examples to list relating to
the abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and negligent care she has received. So I
will go on to explain our latest experience with the last Agency Provider she
received inappropriate care from.
She spent months with this particular Agency Provider being
medically neglected on a daily basis.
- There
were repeated med errors, including medications not available (as well as
missing) and/or she wasn’t given her meds, as well as staff not being trained
or certified to pass meds so she was forced to go without them because there
was no staff available that could give her the meds she is required to take.
- Numerous
times where she was not fed for 20+ hours at a time, even though the meds she takes
require her to eat on a consistently normal basis.
- She
was not taken to nor were many of her needed medical appointments scheduled,
including extremely important medical issues that were repeatedly ignored (ex:
biopsies for breast cancer, and brain surgery rehab).
As a family we fought the Agency Provider to provide
appropriate medical care to my sister, and filed complaint after complaint
after complaint with the County and State, which the County and State failed to
“substantiate”, and failed to protect her in any manner at all.
- Then
as a retaliatory result of our fighting for my sister the Agency then
limited/restricted our (family and guardian) communication with ALL agency
staff, the house manager, and the manager on call, and required that we
only be allowed to communicate with the Agency’s Director and her administrative
staff, even in the event of an
emergency. Those actions jeopardized my sister’s health and safety even
more so than the Agency’s previous actions.
In addition to the above issues, my sister also endured
months of repeated verbal and emotional abuse by the Agency Provider staff and
house manager. We would remove her from the home at those times, and file MUI
reports with the County Board, all of which were ignored and found to be
“unsubstantiated allegations” each and every time we filed a complaint.
- After
the same Agency Provider had 3 unnecessary and inexcusable deaths of
developmentally disabled individuals within their homes/ care in less than a 5
month time frame, the State finally revoked the Agency’s certification based on
identical allegations (from other families) of medical neglect, verbal
abuse, improper investigations/ interviews, destruction/ shredding of
documentation/ evidence (by the Director of Nursing), and wrongful deaths,
which were finally “substantiated” by the State. The State reinstated the
Agency’s certification after 4 months once the Agency simply submitted a plan
of correction.
- This
evidence I can point to as the exact reason why the State claims that abuse and
fraud is more prevelant among Independent Providers. Unfortunately the State
fails to even investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, or any wrongdoing of
Agency Providers unless they are forced to do so after multiple deaths at the
hands of that provider! Please review the following News Investigation which
has documented the State’s neglect, this article also addresses the abuse and
neglect of the Agency Provider with whom my sister received her care from. http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/investigations/newschannel5-investigates-neglect-and-abuse-of-ohios-disabled-slips-under-the-radar
As a result of the Agency’s failure to appropriately care
for my sister, and the County and State’s failure to protect my sister, we
removed my sister from that Agency provider on an emergency basis. Immediately
I became a certified Medicaid Independent Provider through the State in order
to protect my sister from neglectful and abusive Agency Providers, and the
State and County who failed to protect her adequately in any manner at all.
We fought so hard to give my sister the life she deserves,
the opportunity to be treated fairly, to be protected, and to be loved. I
became my sister’s Independent Provider because of these above reasons. Because
not another single human being, agency provider, county board, or entire DD
system would fight as hard as we have to make sure she is taken care of
appropriately, and has the opportunity to live the life she so rightly
deserves!
Governor Kasich’s proposal to phase out Independent
Providers in the State of Ohio will take away so many of the things we have
fought so hard for my sister for over the last 20+ years. This proposal will
force her to have to endure many more years of medical neglect, abuse, improper
care, lack of care or concern, and possibly even death by being imprisoned is a
system who does not care enough to fight for my sister or any of the other
developmentally disabled individuals this system was meant to care for, provide
for, and protect!
In addition to my concerns over my sister and her future,
this proposal will eliminate the “jobs” of 13,000 up to 23,000 (DODD website
list 23,804 certified IP’s as of 3/9/15) Certified Independent Providers (IP’s)
in the State of Ohio.
- That
means that these providers will be forced to work for Agencies that they have
worked so hard to get away from for many reasons.
o Mostly due to the fact that Agencies
don’t care about the people they are supposed to be serving, nor do they care
about their employees.
o Agencies
fail to offer appropriate, adequate, or thorough training, and insist on paying
the barest minimum wage possible and then offer employees the least amount of
hours available in order to avoid having to pay overtime.
o That
means that a hard working provider who works for an agency would receive
$15,500 (gross income) per year.
-
This equation clearly demonstrates that
regardless if these IP’s are forced to work for agencies, or if they become
unemployed they will ALL qualify for (and require) some form of government
assistance in terms of Food, Medical, or Cash assistance in order to help
support their own families. Families, meaning it will not only be the providers
who qualify for and seek welfare assistance but it will be their entire family
that will now be forced to receive government assistance in order to live and
survive!
On top of those facts, 16,000+ DD individuals will be robbed
of their supposed rights and will now be forced to receive their care through
Agency Providers if they could even find an agency that is able to provide services
for them.
- Ohio
Department of Developmental Disabilities provider search website lists 12,387
Agency Providers currently as being certified in the State of Ohio.
o What
kind of mathematical equation demonstrates that these Agency Providers could
possibly support the service needs and requirements of the 16,000+ developmentally
disabled individuals who will no longer be receiving their services from
Independent Providers once they are phased out of the system?
o How could these Agency Providers ever
offer the additional 41,260 DD individuals who are placed on Ohio’s waiting
lists for waiver services any type of care or support in the future? This type
of change or transformation to Ohio’s DD system will make the already broken system
crumble and fail.
It is a fact that the real issues behind the Governor’s
proposal to eliminate Independent Provider’s (IP) and to move to an Agency-Only
service model is strictly based on new federal labor laws, which became
effective January 2015.
- These
laws would require the State or the County to now be considered the “EMPLOYER” of
the IP, which would force the State/ County to have to pay minimum wage and
overtime to ALL IP’s in the State of Ohio.
- In
order to avoid those responsibilities the Governor’s proposal would create a
loophole for the State by passing those strict FLSA law requirements onto
Agency Providers and/ or self-directed waiver recipients and their families by
making those individuals become the “EMPLOYER OF RECORD”.
- By
forcing the waiver recipient/ family of a self-directed waiver to become the “Employer
of Record” in order to maintain their Free Choice of Independent Provider this
means that the waiver recipient/ family would now be responsible for adhering
to strict FLSA laws, and inherit the responsibility of paying minimum wage and
overtime requirements, not to mention the IRS requirements of paying taxes that
they must comply with also.
o This is extremely dangerous territory
for DD individuals/ families who are unaware of the actual ramifications,
because there is a high probability that those individuals will end up facing
severe and disastrous consequences as a result.
o In
addition, when the State caps the funding of these individuals at $40,000 per
year (which is the max allowed for the SELF Waiver), and the individual
requires an exceeding amount of care or even 24/7/365 care, the individual or
family as the “Employer” is then going to be responsible for paying anything
over that cap in order to comply with the minimum wage and overtime
requirements of the federal labor laws. How will they truly be able to pay for
the care they require and need?
The State has neglected to be honest, open, or transparent
in any way at all regarding this proposal. The State has blamed Independent
Providers as being the problem, pointing to us as fraudulent and abusive
criminals as their reason to eliminate us as Medicaid Providers.
- Independent
Provider’s, waiver recipients, and families came together to inform each other
of this proposal (because the State failed to inform us, or include us), and to
work with several organizations in order to raise awareness regarding this
proposal, and to share resources in order to speak up and have a voice that
would be heard in which we strongly oppose the elimination of Ohio’s
Independent Providers. Below are a few resources where you can hear our voices,
our concerns, and get to know the real people that will be affected by this
proposal.
- After
we, as an extremely concerned community, all united and came together to oppose
this proposal, the truth came to light, and the real, honest, and transparent
reasons behind this proposal were exposed. Here are portions of a news article
that was published recently which revealed the truth surrounding this proposal.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/03/15/state-liability-drives-plan-to-phase-out-independents.html
o
But now, with angry families and consumer advocates
questioning that rationale, a top administration official acknowledged on Friday that communication missteps were made. The state's potential
liability for independent home-care workers' pay and benefits under new federal
labor rules figured just as prominently as fraud in the thinking behind the
plan.
o
"We got them to admit that they rolled it out
incorrectly," said Gary Tonks, executive director of the ARC of Ohio. "They said the reason was fraud.
The real reason is about the Fair Labor Standards Act."
o
Ohioans deserve a "forthright" discussion of the
budget proposal, Tonks said. His organization represents people with
developmental and intellectual disabilities, many of whom say they receive
better, more-reliable care from independent providers than through home health
agencies.
o
"We understand the wage issues," Tonks said.
"But work with us. Most of our families who have chosen independent
providers chose them because of a bad experience with an agency."
o
Administration
officials wrongly used language that seemed to pit home-care agencies against
independent providers, said Greg Moody, director of Kasich's Office of Health
Transformation."That was not really what we're doing, and it was our
mistake in how we talked about it," he said. He acknowledged that the state is
responding to a new federal labor rule that says home-care workers are entitled
to minimum wage, overtime and travel reimbursement.
o
And, according to the Department of Labor's guidance for
implementing the rule, states could be considered a joint employer of
independent home-care workers and could be responsible for that additional
compensation and, possibly, benefits. Moody said the state has not performed an analysis to determine the
size of that potential liability under the new rule, which the
home-care industry is fighting in court.
o
Michael Kirkman, executive director of Disability Rights
Ohio, said the administration created an environment of distrust and
apprehension that was unnecessary by not discussing the plan before including
it in the budget.
§ "The
department miscalculated the depth of feeling about this and used a
justification that was superficial at best, when in fact there are much more
complex issues that are really driving the conversation," Kirkman said.
§ "We've not
had experience with independent providers committing fraud on the clients we've
worked with and represented." Ohio doesn't want to be in the
business of employing home-care workers.
o
But, Moody said, the state wants to create more ways for
consumers to be able to choose the people who care for them, including, in some
cases, family members.
o
"Parents are passionate about this issue," said
Adam Herman, a spokesman for the Ohio Association of County Boards of
Developmental Disabilities. "Some of their comments were heartbreaking
when we read them. There's a lot of fear out there."
o
The association hasn't yet taken a position on the
proposal, but it is collecting feedback from families, independent providers,
agencies and others. Of more than 1,000 surveys completed by Feb. 20,
respondents were overwhelmingly against the phaseout, Herman said.
I beg you to stop and understand ALL of the actual facts surrounding
this proposal which will so greatly impact Ohio’s DD population in such a
negative and devastating manner. I beg you to understand where the true
problems of fraud and abuse lie within this system, and to fully understand
that the majority of Independent Providers do not work for Agency Providers
because of the facts that those Agency’s do not care enough about these
individuals to actually fight for them, their rights, their freedoms, their
protections, their health and safety, their happiness or their lives, instead
these DD individuals are just another dollar to these Agencies.
I beg you to take your time to sit down with the Independent
Providers to listen to their stories of why they became Independent Providers,
and why they do not work for Agency Providers. I beg you to sit down with the
developmentally disabled individuals and their families to listen to why they
chose to have Independent Providers over Agency Providers, to listen to the
stories of neglect, abuse, and horrors that they have been forced to experience
in the hands of Agency Providers. I beg you to fully understand the entire DD
system, to understand where the abuse and the fraud and the neglect really
exists before making a decision that will impact thousands upon thousands of
developmentally disabled individuals lives, their families, and their
independent providers before deciding whether or not to agree to phase out
those independent providers who care so deeply about the individuals that they
serve, and that they are willing to fight so hard for!!! I beg you to fully
understand the rights that the DD individuals (and community) has fought so
hard to earn for these individuals, which they will only be robbed of if this
proposal is approved.
I thank you kindly for taking my testimony into
consideration, and listening to the voices of the people who were not included by
the State in the discussion(s) relating to this proposal! Again I ask you not
to approve this proposal to eliminate Ohio’s Independent Providers.
Sincerely,
Andreah Forbes
Very nice summary of the entire situation. How could anyone on that committee not take these words to heart and work diligently find a way to make this system work for everyone?
ReplyDeleteThank you!!!
ReplyDeleteAs an IP, I thank you for this. Keep fighting the good fight!
ReplyDelete